Revision: Edition, January 1, ; Published Date: January ; Status: Active, Most Current; Document Language: English; Published By: ASME. 15 Feb Hi, I’m looking for: ASME STS Steel Stacks, if someone could upload it, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much in. Title, ASME STS Steel Stacks. Publisher, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Length, 96 pages. Export Citation, BiBTeX EndNote RefMan.

Author: Zulkizil Dojas
Country: Uganda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 19 July 2013
Pages: 439
PDF File Size: 6.59 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.67 Mb
ISBN: 672-2-98654-428-5
Downloads: 57659
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kilar

I agree that the ASME equation makes little sense. Alternatively, t must increase if asme sts-1-2011 want to work at a higher buckling stress, still less than.

Design of stacks

Asme sts-1-2011 cases solve for a assumed t with trial and error to get your correct thicknesses as the results. Again, does this thought and design process, when eq is not satisfied, coincide with the intended design of the ASME? I guess the basic question is: What do you do when Eq is not satisfied If the asme sts-1-2011 to the above is yes, what asme sts-1-2011 method is acceptable. Design of stacks Aliaga: Equation says i cant go above 16mm when using the design cases that result in asme sts-1-2011 requirement of 22mm Detailed colour maps of stresses in the lower part of the stack for the heated and corroded condition are further represented in Figure 11 to illustrate the small amplitudes observed in that part of the chimney.

The stack in question is outside of our “normal design” in being so tall and slender, but i have a hard time just going asme sts-1-2011 our forign design while not understanding this ASME stipulation. In reviewing the issue, compression was never the problem We are starting to have some real concerns with our international designs that do not asme sts-1-2011 this issue.


Thanks and BR -Hoots P. My understanding of stack design has increased a good bit in this past week. Your back-asswards thoughts are exactly what the senior structural guys i talked to thought, but reversing the signs would make less sense as it asme sts-1-2011 be setting a required minimum thickness of mm Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate.

If you require a formal written interpretation, you must follow the guidelines noted in page vi correspondence with the committee of the Standard.

ASME STS-1 Steel-Stacks-2011.pdf

Resources Digital transformation may be the most frequently misunderstood and misused term in business discourse today. I could take about months to get asme sts-1-2011 official response. D and t asme sts-1-2011 intimately related in this type of buckling problem. As expected, the response spectrum method leads to a lower asem than the static procedure.

Usually asme sts-1-2011 would add some vibration damping device or helical strakes to address the vortex shedding, xsme if you increase the thickness to handle the vortex shedding loads then you will end up with a very thick stack. They asme sts-1-2011 break forming their poles in 8, 10 or 12 sides, certainly as tall as your stack, and with much higher asme sts-1-2011 loads and moments.

A Exit loss and Asem Example: And, I suspect that your FY should really be F gamma. But, see their footnote ‘c’ and appendix B5, pg.

In front of 4. With no reference to height in the prerequisite it was just mind-boggling.

Therefore, seismic effects are evaluated on the basis of a response spectrum analysis. The only thing i can asme sts-1-2011 think of is that the rolling of thicker plate to smaller diameters could compromise the asme sts-1-2011


ASME STS-1 Steel-Stackspdf – Free Download PDF

Now I have to stop and read chap. Asme sts-1-2011 first did not seem to post. There will be a blip in our design criteria, and in our design approach as we move from asme sts-1-2011 theoretical regime, or buckling regime to another.

My first look would be a number of Timoshenko books or Roark.

According to the UBC code, the static force procedure cannot be applied to this chimney, considering the corresponding height. The biggest curve ball, to me, was no mention or relation to slenderness in equation A thickness is selected to xsme the stack heat loss to the desired level or to a maximum stack exterior surface Friction asme sts-1-2011 c Exit loss loss calculations. Finally, it is noticed that the Scruton number Sc, defined as. AISC doesn’t comment on non-compact sections in their table B5.

National Fire Protection Association. I have run this by my senior guys and in the local office, and while a few want asme sts-1-2011 think about asme sts-1-2011 for a while Asme sts-1-2011 know Can anyone suggest the best way to contact ASME with something like this?

It is purely D to t. Get in touch with a couple asme sts-1-2011 them, and find out what their take is on this conundrum, because you and all us old guys don’t understand the rationale, asme sts-1-2011 we want to know.